There is No Due on Sale Jail

The "due-on-sale" clause is probably the most talkedas a device for "preventing subsequent purchasers
about, feared and misunderstood topic in real estate.from assuming loans with lower than market interest
This article will dispel any misunderstandings you mayrates." This idea was also confirmed by the Court in
have about the due-on-sale and suggest a simple, yetCommunity Title Company v. Roosevelt Savings &
effective strategy to get around it.Loan 670 S.W.2d 895 (Mo.App. 1984): "The
Before we discuss how to get around thedue-on-sale clause was a way of eliminating these
due-on-sale, we must understand what it is andlow yielding loans as soon as the property was sold,
where it came from. The due-on-sale (a.k.aso that it could re-loan the money at current higher
"acceleration clause") is a provision in a mortgagerates or negotiate a higher rate in the event the
document which gives the lender the right to demandpurchaser assumed the existing loan."
payment of the remaining balance of the loan whenThe homeowners fought the banks in court claiming
the property is sold. It is a contractual right, not athat the enforcement of the due-on-sale was "unfair
law. This means that if title to the property istrade practice" and an "unreasonable restraint on the
transferred, the bank may (or may not), at itsalienation of property." In state courts, many
option, decide to "call the loan due."homeowners were winning the argument. See, e.g.,
An "assumable" loan is one which is secured by aWellenkamp v. Bank of America, 21 Cal 3d 943
mortgage which contains no due-on-sale provision.(1978). The banks ultimately won in a United States
FHA-insured mortgages originated before 12/89 andSupreme Court case, Fidelity Federal Savings and
VA-guaranteed loans originated before 2/88 containLoan Association v. de la Cuesta, 102 S.Ct. 3014,
no due-on-sale provisions. Nearly all loans originated(1982). Congress thereafter passed the "Garn-St.
today contain a "standard" due-on-sale clause whichGermain Federal Depositary Institutions Act" (12 U.S.C.
usually reads something like:1701-j), which codified the enforceability of the
"If all or any part of the property herein isdue-on-sale clause, despite state statute or case law
transferred without the lender's prior written consent,to the contrary.
the lender may require all sums secured herebyMany people are under the mistaken impression that
immediately due and payable."transferring title to a property secured by a
Banks began inserting due-on-sale clauses in their"due-on-sale" mortgage is illegal. This is because most
mortgages in the 1970s when interest rates roselay people confuse civil liability with criminal liability. To
dramatically. Home buyers were assuming existingbe "illegal," you must be in violation of a criminal law,
loans rather than borrowing new money from bankscode or statute.
because the interest rates on existing loans wereThere is no federal or state law which makes it a
lower. The banks used the due-on-sale as a way tocrime to violate a due-on-sale clause. If the lender
kill their own worst competition. They argued thatdiscovers the transfer, it may at its option, call the
the reason for the restriction was to be able toloan due and payable. If it cannot be paid, the lender
police who was living in the property and thehas the option of commencing foreclosure
collateral for their loan.proceedings.
This argument holds little water, since most banksSo the real question is: are you willing to take a
haven't been enforcing due-on-sale violations sinceproperty subject to a mortgage containing a
the early 80's when interest rates were high. In fact,due-on-sale clause with the risk of getting caught?
Black's Law Dictionary defines the due-on-sale clause